2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
96ab4c9cf0 Retire the per-type printers, since print says all of it
print-str, print-i64, print-f64, print-bytes, print-line and newline leave
the prelude. print and println are the whole printing surface now, and print
is the better call at every one of the sites that used them: it is the same
structural walk without the newline, so the no-newline case the family was
kept for is covered, and it takes the value as it is. The old print-i64
forced an explicit (i64 x) at every call site, because this language widens
nothing implicitly; that cast is gone from 127 places.

Dropping it moves one answer. hash-grid returns u64, and the cast through
the signed printer showed sand-headless's hash as -2851001042534928384.
print routes a u64 through flan_u64_to_bytes, so it now prints
15595743031174623232 — the same 64 bits, read as the unsigned number they
are. The pinned expectation follows the correction.

test-flan-dev.el and test_session.ml both reached for print-line as "a name
the prelude has"; they reach for rand-seed instead.
2026-09-12 05:32:25 +07:00
421e09e0d6 A number can reach draw-text now
(string b) is the mirror of (bytes s) and costs nothing: emit.ml already
lowers Types.String and Types.Slice _ to the same %slice, 16 bytes at
align 8, so a string and a [u8] are the identical value at run time and
both directions emit as the argument itself. What changes is only what
the checker will let the value be passed to — which was the whole gap.

Two decisions, both written into check.ml's comment.

It does not check UTF-8, because `string` does not claim UTF-8. The
prelude settles it: valid-utf8? is an ordinary function you call when you
care, decode-rune / rune-at / rune-count all take [u8] and not string,
and decode-rune answers {:ok false :width 1} on a malformed byte rather
than assuming well-formed input. The one place the runtime treats a
string differently from a byte slice is flan_escape_bytes, for a string
nested in a printed structure, and that is a byte-wise escape table with
no decoding in it. A check here would be the only enforcement point in
the language, which is a claim the rest of it does not make.

It does not widen the literal-write hole. That hole is the other
direction — (bytes "Hi") hands back a writable-looking slice over
constant data — and this direction only loses the ability to write, so
the result reaches strictly fewer stores than its argument could.
Provenance is still what the other direction needs; nothing here waits
on it.

The one sharp edge is not new but is easier to trip over now, and is
recorded in both the checker and digits.flan: i64->bytes, f64->bytes and
u64->bytes all view the same static buffer in the runtime, overwritten
by the next call, and calling it a string does not copy it. Format, draw,
then format the next one.

examples/digits.flan keeps its three signatures and loses its middle: the
[10 string] table, the per-glyph pen and the digit arithmetic are gone,
and draw-int is one draw-text. What survives is the part (string ...)
does not answer — i64->bytes has no field width, so "%03i" is still
assembled, and f64->bytes is "%g", so fixed decimal places are still a
split into two integers. core-input-multitouch and
core-input-virtual-controls ignored the width they were given, so both
inline the draw and stop importing digits.flan entirely.

test/programs/string-of-bytes.flan at -O2 and -O0: a number round-tripped,
an empty slice, sub-views whose length is not the underlying storage's,
and the result across a declare-c boundary. The last is the one that
could have been wrong — "hello world" cut to five bytes has a space where
C wants a NUL, so a shim that trusted the bytes would print all eleven.
2026-09-12 05:19:23 +07:00