Joseph Ferano
185d162124
`indexed` took an Array or a Slice, so a `(Ptr T)` that came back
from C was readable at element 0 through `deref` and nowhere else.
The length is not missing from the world — for `font.recs` it is in
the struct, one field over — it was missing from the language.
`(slice-from-ptr p n)` is the form that says it. No marker on the
name: `!` here means mutates and `?` means asks, and `zeroed`, the
nearest neighbour, carries neither; `ptr` is the marker, because a
`(Ptr T)` only ever arrives from a `declare-c`.
Nothing new in the representation. A slice is already {ptr, i64} in
both backends, so this is two insertvalues; `x86.ml` takes the new
constructor on its existing `unsupported` arm.
It refuses a first argument that is not a pointer, a negative literal
length at check time, and a negative computed one at run time — that
last through `signal_block` and `@flan_slice_error`, reused rather
than growing the runtime a function, and *signed*, because
`check_slice` compares unsigned and a negative i32 sign-extends to a
huge u64 that walks through it. Behind `f.md.checks` like the other
two: on at -O0 and -O2, off only when checks were asked off.
It owns nothing and needed no analysis to say so — a slice is not
move-only and carries no allocator, so `free` refuses it by the rule
that already refuses `(as-slice v)`.
`rl/font-recs` and `rl/font-glyphs` are where the promise is written,
beside raylib's own invariant rather than at every call site, and
they are the shape a count-naming binding directive could never have
covered. `examples/text-rectangle-bounds.flan` is the port that
motivated this and it runs; `test/programs/slice-from-ptr.flan`
covers the form with no raylib and no window.
