Joseph Ferano 635d12782d The globals a stopped stack reaches, in one section and not under a frame
A global is program state a frame happened to touch, not part of it, so
nesting it under one implies an ownership that is not there and repeats the
name once per frame that reads it. One section instead, holding the union of
the globals every frame on the stack references — the compiler does the
choosing, since Reach.expr_refs already answers a body's reference set, and
listing every global a program has would bury the one that matters under the
prelude's PRNG state.

Each entry says which frames touch it, by the index the stack section already
numbers them with, which recovers what per-frame nesting would have told you
at no cost in duplication. Ordered by the innermost frame that touches it:
a deep stack makes the union large and proximity to the error is what puts
the likely culprit on top.

Simpler than locals, because a global is reached by name rather than by
address. Emit.redefinition writes a global the host has as external, so the
thunk binds to the program's own storage and nothing is asked of the stopped
thread — no dev-slot round trip and no not-yet-bound case to refuse.

A frame that cannot be attributed contributes nothing and is named in
:skipped; the union being incomplete and the union being complete are
different answers. The hole in that is stated rather than papered over:
slot_fingerprint hashes a body's slots, which is the right cut for locals and
not for this, so a body that names different globals while binding the same
locals is not caught. The test drives the case that is.

MANUAL.md also loses a stale paragraph claiming the fingerprint check never
fires with a failing test pinned to it. It fires, and test_dev covers it.
2026-09-12 16:22:58 +07:00
2024-07-09 21:01:55 +10:00
2026-09-10 14:56:35 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
Description
No description provided
MIT 7.5 MiB
Languages
OCaml 67.2%
Emacs Lisp 15.2%
C 10.4%
HTML 2.9%
Standard ML 2.8%
Other 1.5%