Joseph Ferano 675241e226 Union values: a tag, a blob, and a case laid over it
defunion parsed and its shape checked; naming the type and constructing a
value were both refused as milestone 6. They are not any more.

A union is Types.Named, exactly as a struct is, so every path that carries a
type -- a field, a parameter, a slot, a copy -- learns nothing about unions.
Which table the name is in is the only thing that tells the two apart.

The layout is a tag then room for the largest case, with the alignment the
widest member of any case needs: %"U" = type { i32, [k x iA] }, and one
named %"U.C" per case laid over the blob. That is C's
struct { int tag; union { ... } u; } byte for byte, which is the requirement
the macro expander's Form will arrive with.

A value is (U.C {.field value ...}), or U.C on its own when the case has no
fields. Construction goes through the struct-literal syntax already there, so
parse.ml is untouched: the dot is a symbol constituent and U.C reads as one
name.

Tags are declaration order from zero, so an all-bytes-zero union is the first
declared case with a zeroed payload -- the same rule that makes an Option's
zero a None, and it makes case order part of a union's contract.

A move-only field in a case is refused in the same words a struct's is, and a
union is refused as a map key: the payload past the case in hand is
indeterminate, so hashing the blob would make two equal values hash
differently.
2026-09-12 16:48:43 +07:00
2024-07-09 21:01:55 +10:00
2026-09-10 14:56:35 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
Description
No description provided
MIT 7.5 MiB
Languages
OCaml 67.2%
Emacs Lisp 15.2%
C 10.4%
HTML 2.9%
Standard ML 2.8%
Other 1.5%