Joseph Ferano 9e0ae3a4ce The compiler can dlopen now, and Form is declared; the expander is not written
Running a macro means compiling it and loading it into the compiler, and the
step that reads as small in NEXT.md is not: OCaml has no dlopen for ELF, and
lib/dune had no foreign_stubs. So the boundary is built first and the expander
not at all. lib/dynload_stubs.c is the whole of it — dlopen, dlsym, a
four-argument call into a macro thunk, and a peek/poke family, because OCaml
cannot address the raw memory a Form image has to be laid out in.

Nothing aggregate crosses to C. The unions lane verified a union's memory
layout against clang, which is a different claim from LLVM's convention for an
aggregate passed or returned by value in hand-written IR, so Emit.macro_thunk
wraps every macro in void(ptr,i64,ptr,ptr): the slice is built and the result
stored on the LLVM side, and the compiler's side is four pointers.

Build.macro_module links the runtime in rather than declaring it external, so
the module has no undefined symbols and the compiler's own link needs no
-rdynamic. That is the difference from Build.shared, whose host is a running
Flan program.

defunion Form and the list-building surface quasiquote will desugar into are in
the prelude. Form mirrors Form.value and not Form.t: no loc field, so the
compiler stamps the call site's location onto everything a macro returns.

The compiler builds. dune test was not run, and Form's layout is asserted
nowhere — NEXT.md's new handoff section says what the three numbers are, what
the next two commits should be, and the four decisions this made that the
design did not settle.
2026-09-12 17:18:26 +07:00
2024-07-09 21:01:55 +10:00
2026-09-10 14:56:35 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
Description
No description provided
MIT 7.5 MiB
Languages
OCaml 67.2%
Emacs Lisp 15.2%
C 10.4%
HTML 2.9%
Standard ML 2.8%
Other 1.5%