Joseph Ferano a3baa0b25a The snapshot was about two threads, and there are still two
Third on the list to delete, and nothing goes. "The compiler can read the
stopped frame's memory directly, so copying it is ceremony" is the right
instinct and the wrong diagnosis: the snapshot was never about two address
spaces.

A stopped program is not holding still. The break loop polls, flan_agent_poll
runs whatever was delivered, and a C-x C-e thunk is arbitrary Flan that pushes
and pops the one global restart list and the shadow stack while it runs. The
compiler is a thread beside it either way. Restart names are copied because
serving them off the live list hands the reader a pointer into a frame the
loop's own poll may already have popped; a pointer is meaningful to the
compiler now, and the frame it points into is no more alive for that. The
fingerprints have a sharper reason still, already written down: the module a
frame's description lives in can be unloaded before the comparison happens.

The generation stamp is about nested breaks. A thunk this loop runs can error,
push a break of its own, and reach chosen_ready first, claiming an index someone
chose from the outer list. Depth cannot tell those apart because a resumed
outer break and a new one reuse the number. One process changes none of that.

So of the three things the merge was expected to make deletable, one was. The
socket was transport. The result cap and the snapshot are concurrency, and were
only mistaken for transport because the socket was in front of them.

What the merge does unlock here is item 4, deliberately not touched:
flan_agent_frame_slot already hands back an address, and in one process the
compiler could read the value there instead of compiling a thunk to print it.
2026-09-12 22:31:36 +07:00
2024-07-09 21:01:55 +10:00
2026-09-10 14:56:35 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
Description
No description provided
MIT 7.5 MiB
Languages
OCaml 67.2%
Emacs Lisp 15.2%
C 10.4%
HTML 2.9%
Standard ML 2.8%
Other 1.5%