Joseph Ferano b3cb657992 hashable? gates the type and not the operations, and say so where it bites
A map keyed by a type variable cannot be put into inside a generic body:
the hash and the equality are concrete symbols chosen from the concrete
key type, and there is none until the copy exists. The refusal now says
that, and says what hashable? does buy - taking and returning a
(Map $t V) - rather than leaving the reader to infer it.

Closing the hole means adding the map operations to the list of forms
the abstract pass defers to instantiation. That list is print and
println and nothing else, and every member is a place where a refusal
moves from the definition to a call site, which is what the abstract
pass exists to prevent. Two is short enough to hold in your head.

Also written down: four of the prelude's copyable? declarations are
convention rather than checker-enforced. The move analysis tracks
locals, not reads out of a slice, so swap! and friends check without it
- and would still duplicate a header at [(Vec i32)].
2026-09-13 15:01:49 +07:00
2024-07-09 21:01:55 +10:00
2026-09-10 14:56:35 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
Description
No description provided
MIT 7.5 MiB
Languages
OCaml 67.2%
Emacs Lisp 15.2%
C 10.4%
HTML 2.9%
Standard ML 2.8%
Other 1.5%