The first cut of the form-change refusal asked only about def and defonce
and asserted in its comment that defconst was another arm's business. It
was not: defconst to def at the same type fell past every arm, and defonce
to defconst fell past them into the consts republish, which stores the
declared value over live storage at the frame boundary. One refusal over
gconst and grerun together now covers all six directions.
And two coverage gaps closed by running rather than reasoning: reload-v6
carries a (def dial i64 5) the host was never built with, so the x86 image
path executes and its 5 shows in the transcript's arithmetic; dev-rerun's
echo reads counter in its initialiser and follows it 40, 41, 42, 43 across
re-runs, where a captured first answer would print 40 four times.
The trio the author decided on 2026-09-20 is now all built: def is CL's
defparameter — its initialiser runs on every daemon re-run, unguarded, so
an edited initialiser repaints the same storage on C-c C-c plus re-run —
defonce (Clojure's name for CL's defvar, per the author) initialises once
behind the .init~once. flag, and defconst stays the image.
One parse arm reads both forms; the difference is Ast.reinit, carried to
Tast.global's grerun. Emit.startup_plan gives a def no guard flag, and
Check.check_global lifts every def initialiser — zero and literal
included — into global/<n>, so the host's startup reaches it through the
function cell and a re-evaluated def swaps it (Session's def_inits;
Emit.redefinition declares the cell for a non-sibling target). The old
defvar spelling is refused with the rename and both compiling spellings,
and every program, test, doc and editor list is swept — except sand.flan,
the author's live WIP, whose seven defvar lines are flagged in FIX.org
and keep its three dependent tests red on this branch.
DISCUSS.org's "need a value-producing array constructor": the author
wanted grid filled with 255 as part of its declaration and could not
write it. (array n T) produces the zeroed array only, and dotimes is
Unit, so it can mutate a place that already exists but cannot be the
initialiser expression -- which has to produce the whole value in one
go. The grid was declared zeroed and filled in main instead.
Two forms, both expressions, both any rank:
(array-fill [rows cols] 255) every element that value
(array-gen [rows cols] cell) every element (cell i j)
Spelled apart rather than one form dispatching on the third element's
type, because an array *of* function values is a thing to want and one
form would have to decide whether (array-fill [4] f) meant four copies
of f or four calls of it.
The dimensions are read in Parse, and that is the whole reason they are
recognised there: handed through as an ordinary call, [rows cols] is an
array literal of two names, and where those names are defconsts it is a
perfectly good two-element array of integers -- the wrong reading, and a
silent one. Read in Parse they are the same len the [n T] type spelling
takes, resolved by the same array_len, with one extra condition of their
own: the fill counts in i32 like every index in the language, so a
dimension no i32 can reach has no loop that could end.
The lowering is a loop over a slot, not an aggregate. Tast.Arr is the
node the backends have and both build it element by element from a list
as long as the array; a fill of [600 [800 u8]] is half a million
elements and there is no list to be had. So these bind the array to a
slot, zero it, run one While per dimension writing through Set of a
Pindex, and answer with the slot -- While, Set and Pindex, which is the
argument check_loop already makes for recur. Nothing new reaches a
backend and all three get the form with no edit. The value stays
value-like: the slot is the form's own, and the Local at the end copies
out the way any array-typed expression does.
Row-major is pinned, not incidental: the first dimension is the
outermost loop, and a generator that counts observes it. The fill value
and the generator value are each bound once before any loop starts, so
(array-fill [n] (next-id)) is one call and n copies of its answer.
What falls out for the defvar the note was written about, and neither
half is a carve-out:
(defvar grid [rows [cols u8]] (array-fill [rows cols] 255))
is the spelling that works -- a typed global with a computed
initialiser, which is the startup-lifted path with the init-once guard
that defvar already had, so the fill runs once and the value survives a
re-run like any other computed one. The three-element spelling means
what the 2026-09-20 rule says it means: not a type, so a dyn global, and
a typed fixed array crosses into dyn only as a view of storage that
outlives the view. A freshly built array is a temporary, so it is
refused -- by the element rule where the elements are themselves an
array, by the lifetime rule where they are one of the three scalars a
view carries. Both refusals are the ones any other temporary gets.
The type an array-fill builds never goes through resolve, so resolve's
own guard is asked again where it is built: a fixed array of function
values would be zeroed, and a zeroed function value is a null pointer.
The refusal moves to the checker: Emit.const refused a computed defconst by
name while the x86 backend ran it through the startup function behind an
.init~once. flag, like a defvar, so the two backends disagreed about the same
program. One refusal in Check.const_defconst_init ends that, and it is the only
place that can name the way through.
The accepted set is unchanged: Tast.const_init's, which is Emit.const's and the
x86 data_sym path's, plus the integer arithmetic collect's folding pass has
already turned into an Int before the initialiser is looked at.
Emit.const's two refusals become a failwith no program reaches; emit_global's
gconst || const_init loses its left half; x86 needed no edit, since it never
classified by the form. test_flan's infers probe asks Check.expression now that
a defconst can no longer wrap an arbitrary expression.
The guard flag was named .init-once.<global>, and . and - are ordinary
symbol constituents, so (defvar .init-once.x i64 7) beside a computed x
emitted the same symbol twice: the dev build died at the assembler on both
backends, and the flag's Bool was registered over the user's global in
Emit.globals so the store came out as an i1. It is .init~once.<global> now;
~ terminates a symbol in the reader, the same trick destructure~N uses.
test/programs/dev-rerun.flan carries such a global and no new printed line.
Three places said a defconst is the linker's image on one backend and a
constructor's stores on the other and a re-run reaches neither. Tast.const_init
splits on the initialiser and not on the form, so that holds only for a
constant initialiser; a computed defconst is guarded like a defvar on x86 and
refused outright by emit.ml's const. The sentences now say that, including
the divergence.
emit.ml also claimed Check.no_transfer_in_init made it impossible to leave the
guarded branch between the store and the flag. It is syntactic over the
written initialiser only: a callee can signal unhandled and take the call's
transfer edge out, leaving the flag false — which is what should happen, since
the next run retries. Read off the emitted IR for such a program.
The x86 float-Rem comment says why the dead movabs before fmod is kept, and
its mid-sentence line break is gone; math3.flan's first float-% line prints
six values, not four.
